Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine has vetoed legislation that would have required the vast majority of voters to provide their photo ID to cast a mail-in ballot.
"H.B. 472 is all burden for so little benefit," DeWine said in his veto message Wednesday evening.
Currently, to get an absentee ballot, a voter must provide their generic personal information, a signature and either the last four digits of their Social Security number or their full driver’s license number. They also could provide a photo ID, but it isn't required.
Under House Bill 472, an applicant would need to complete all prior work, plus upload a live-capture photo ID and an electronic signature to an online portal — one that would need to be created by the state. Individuals could also mail a photocopy to their board of elections.
"House Bill 472 would not discourage fraud, would not add any real security, and would create an additional and significant burden for Ohioans who vote by mail," DeWine said.
This bill is not needed, he added, because Ohio does an excellent job running elections.
To be clear, there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in Ohio, even when photo ID laws weren't in place. Thousands of audits have proven that.
RELATED: Ohio sec. of state candidates split on mail-in voter ID bill DeWine considering veto on
Democrats have been rallying for weeks for the governor to veto, arguing it was done at the last minute, written poorly and is unnecessary.
DeWine wasn’t the only Republican with concerns. Talking to reporters, Sec. LaRose said it was being pushed too quickly and would require money. The bill doesn’t provide funding to boards of elections.
Previously, the governor has expressed his dissatisfaction with moves like this from GOP leaders, yet he has still signed their election legislation. This time, it was different.
"Because much has already been done legislatively, I have said that a very compelling case must be made if we are to change Ohio’s election laws once again," the governor wrote. "House Bill 472 does not make that compelling case."
Agreeing with activists, he said that H.B. 472 not only had technical errors but would also cause vulnerable voters to have a harder time making their voices heard.
"While there may be disagreement whether these are large or small burdens, they are burdens, nonetheless, and when layered upon the existing steps already required to vote absentee and vote by mail, there would certainly be voters discouraged from exercising their right to vote," the governor said.
Senate Finance Chair Jerry Cirino (R-Kirtland) said he wasn’t sure if the Republicans would come back from their summer break to override his veto, but said he was disappointed.
"That is a misunderstanding that people don’t realize,” Cirino said. “They think it was rushed, but we had to get a lot of things done, including the budget, before we broke for summer recess.”
Read the governor's full veto message below:
"House Bill 472 would not discourage fraud, would not add any real security, and would create an additional and significant burden for Ohioans who vote by mail.
"This bill is not needed, because Ohio does an excellent job running elections. We know who wins on election night and not weeks later!
"Ohio does a good job of administering elections, as we have provided ample opportunities to cast votes, while avoiding the problems we have seen in recent federal elections in other states. As Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose has said, 'We’ve ensured Ohio elections are the gold standard nationwide.'
"The Ohio Association of Election Officials (OAEO) -- a group of Republicans and Democrats, representing Ohio’s 88 county boards of elections and their staff members who are on the front lines of elections, works to ensure that Ohio’s elections are fair, accurate, and reliable. This bipartisan group agrees that Ohio’s election system is strong and 'is widely regarded as one of the most secure and well-administered in the nation. The success of that system is the result of careful planning, adequate resources, bipartisan administration, and the ability of elections officials to implement changes thoughtfully and effectively.'
"The Ohio Legislature has worked hard to fine tune our election laws over the last few years. In fact, since taking office as Governor in 2019, I have signed numerous election-related bills into law that help protect the integrity of the voting process. Because much has already been done legislatively, I have said that a very compelling case must be made if we are to change Ohio’s election laws once again.
"House Bill 472 does not make that compelling case.
"H.B. 472 does not give voter officials any new tools to fight fraud. The heart of this bill has to do with photo identification documents (IDs). The purpose of a photo ID is to match the picture on the ID with the face of the person presenting the ID. This makes logical sense when votes are cast in person. However, requiring the photo ID for the mail-in ballot process does not provide election officials with any opportunity to verify if the ID picture matches the face of the voter and thereby serves as no additional verification of the voter’s true identity.
"Further, H.B. 472 would create a new burden for absentee voters by requiring them to take new, additional steps for their vote to be counted. Absentee voters would now be required either to access a new online portal and learn how to use it to upload images of their photo ID, or make and print photocopies of their photo ID, or affirm they are exempt from these requirements via a specific form that does not yet exist but would need to be created by the Secretary of State. While there may be disagreement whether these are large or small burdens, they are burdens, nonetheless, and when layered upon the existing steps already required to vote absentee and vote by mail, there would certainly be voters discouraged from exercising their right to vote.
"The burden added in H.B. 472 would particularly impact, as the Ohio Association of Election Official says, 'senior citizens, individuals living in long-term care facilities, voters with mobility challenges, and those with limited access to technology may face additional burdens that could discourage participation or prevent otherwise eligible voters from casting a ballot.' The American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) echoed these concerns, saying that 'many older Ohioans have successfully voted absentee for years. As requirements change, additional steps, verification requirements, or technical processes can create barriers if they are not carefully designed and clearly understood. Even when well-intended, increased complexity can make it harder for eligible voters to successfully complete the process.'
"It should also be noted that H.B. 472 would require significant changes, including technical changes that are not funded. According to the Ohio Legislative Service Commission, 'The Secretary of State will incur significant costs either to create in-house or contract with an IT vendor to make and maintain a secure online portal allowing for the submission of absent voter ballot applications according to the bill’s specifications.' Likewise, county Boards of Elections would incur new administrative costs with no additional resources provided. In other words, this is an unfunded mandate both for the Ohio Secretary of State and for every county in Ohio.
"And so, while on paper, one can make the case that there is a pathway for absentee voters to overcome the hurdles to voting that this bill creates, if the net result is that a number of voters will be deterred from making the attempt to vote, that result is hurtful -- not helpful -- to our efforts to include all of our citizens in the most basic act that involves them in our democratic process. The provision in H.B. 472 that allows for online absentee ballot applications is much needed, and I commend the Legislature for passing it. It is unfortunate that it is in a bill that I must veto.
"H.B. 472 is all burden for so little benefit. Therefore, this veto is in the public interest."
Follow WEWS statehouse reporter Morgan Trau on Twitter and Facebook.
